WHAT OF FACEBOOK?

Facebook as a definition of new media has come in with new ways of communication. Apart from its novelty and uniqueness, today it rates as a chief medium that is rendered to misuse and abuse. Facebook came with an objective of connecting and uniting people across borders. Currently, this privilege is highly been abused by users who due to their nature of broken values have extended their spoiled characters to facebook. Since the inception of facebook four years away, its objective of pure communication is depleting with time and every changing minute.

Users have borrowed from their dilapidated nature of morals and brought lewdness in public where it is discussed openly without any feather of shame. We don't know whether to believe that this is how society is majorly hampered when it come to values or we should question the backgrounds of individual members who perpetrate such content of information that can easily corrupt another man's morals.Whereas we would like to take the matter as a permanent fixture in human legion to abusing privilege, on another end, we are tempted to take the view as an over extended mandate taken too far unnecessarily.

Why can't facebook remain facebook a social media for network? Must our communication contain eroticses for us to know that we are communicating? We know human beings have been cited in the holy book as agents of evil from their youth. But must we be validated by our definition? Can't these characters who are castigating facebook in the wrong image find better things to discuss? Even if they are such raptured as they have portrayed themselves on facebook, who asked to be fed on their lewd content?

I hate this individual on my facebook wall who goes by the tag name of utamu wa kulic. This person has gone further to expose bedroom affairs in public describing every detail without any fear or favor. I don't make out where respect for sex and marriage went to, or perhaps this kind of mentality is a magnified suggestion that many Kenyans entertain pettiness at the expense of common sense as suggested in the matrimonial act? We still wonder with open mouths where our society is driving to given such kind of findings.